Well, this is not very helpful right now since the dst does not have 
hits info. Oh well.
                                                 Vitaliy
                                 
Tancredi Botto wrote:
>which goes back to the issue raised last week, that you should not use 
>"tracks" for the veto but only wch hits. There will be always be a 
>tracking inefficiency and therefore holes in your veto if the analysis
>does not ground itself on raw wch hits.
>
>
>  
>
>>Vitaliy,
>>
>>one thing comes to my mind. We increased the low-momentum cutoff to 
>>150MeV/c (=proton kinetic energy of 12 MeV). Assuming 50MeV/c tolerance 
>>to account for resolution effects, means 200 MeV/c (or 21 MeV).
>>
>>Supposedly a proton track with kinetic energy < 25 MeV is likely not 
>>assigned to a track, but may still be recognized as a neutron when it 
>>still fired a neutron counter and no ToF.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>  Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, vitaliy ziskin wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>To back up my point.  I include a picture of an unpol hydrogen runs 
>>>normalized to charge.  These data sets have different runs in them since 
>>>no all hydrogen runs have been recrunched.  In black is the latest 
>>>recrunch and in read is the data before the recrunch.  Do I need to say 
>>>anything else.  What went wrong?
>>>
>>>                                                                         
>>>Vitaliy
>>>
>>>
>>>vitaliy ziskin wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Well, for whatever it is worth, the recrunched hydrogen runs show a 
>>>>huge increase in the "neutron" rate, factor of 2.5 where as neutron 
>>>>yield increased by about 1.5 probably mostly due to misidentified 
>>>>"protons".  I now even see a nice missing mass peak in the hydrogen 
>>>>runs.  Is it possible that we are no assigning more hits to the 
>>>>neutron detector than before or not assigning enough to the tofs. Or 
>>>>maybe bats somehow get in the way.  Please... I need your help.
>>>>                                                               Cheers, 
>>>>Vitaliy
>>>>
>>>>Chris Crawford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>hi eugene,
>>>>> you can always do a joint analysis from dst and raw data.  just open 
>>>>>both filetypes together, and loop through them in sync.
>>>>>--chris
>>>>>
>>>>>Eugene J. Geis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>lrd is not generating new lr-#### ntuples as well as flr and dst?  I 
>>>>>>notice none
>>>>>>in the recrunch directory.  Is there potentially a new entry with 
>>>>>>all wire
>>>>>>chamber hits per event regardless of a link to a track?  Could be quite
>>>>>>important for the neutrons...  -eg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Quoting Michael Kohl <kohlm@mit.edu>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Vitaliy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Chi mentioned to me that in this BlastLib version the dst header 
>>>>>>>information is not copied over. Maybe this is related to your
>>>>>>>problem?!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Look at the yields for each spin state separately if your asymmetries
>>>>>>>are inconclusive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-- 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>>>>>>>| Office:                             | Home:                    |
>>>>>>>|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
>>>>>>>| Dr. Michael Kohl                    | Michael Kohl             |
>>>>>>>| Laboratory for Nuclear Science      | 5 Ibbetson Street        |
>>>>>>>| MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143     |
>>>>>>>| Middleton, MA 01949                 | U.S.A.                   |
>>>>>>>| U.S.A.                              |                          |
>>>>>>>| -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  | -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
>>>>>>>| Email: kohlm@mit.edu                | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de    |
>>>>>>>| Work: +1-617-253-9207               | Home:   +1-617-629-3147  |
>>>>>>>| Fax:  +1-617-253-9599               | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190  |
>>>>>>>| http://blast.lns.mit.edu            |                          |
>>>>>>>+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Eugene Geis
>>>>>>PhD Student, Physics Department, ASU
>>>>>>Research Affiliate, MIT-Bates Laboratory of Nuclear Science
>>>>>>eugene.geis@asu.edu
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-------------------------------water is 
>>>>>>good------------------------------
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     **  Check Out the Phatty Acidz @ http://www.phattyacidz.com  **
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST