which goes back to the issue raised last week, that you should not use 
"tracks" for the veto but only wch hits. There will be always be a 
tracking inefficiency and therefore holes in your veto if the analysis
does not ground itself on raw wch hits.
> Vitaliy,
> 
> one thing comes to my mind. We increased the low-momentum cutoff to 
> 150MeV/c (=proton kinetic energy of 12 MeV). Assuming 50MeV/c tolerance 
> to account for resolution effects, means 200 MeV/c (or 21 MeV).
> 
> Supposedly a proton track with kinetic energy < 25 MeV is likely not 
> assigned to a track, but may still be recognized as a neutron when it 
> still fired a neutron counter and no ToF.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   Michael
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, vitaliy ziskin wrote:
> 
> > To back up my point.  I include a picture of an unpol hydrogen runs 
> > normalized to charge.  These data sets have different runs in them since 
> > no all hydrogen runs have been recrunched.  In black is the latest 
> > recrunch and in read is the data before the recrunch.  Do I need to say 
> > anything else.  What went wrong?
> > 
> >                                                                          
> > Vitaliy
> > 
> > 
> > vitaliy ziskin wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, for whatever it is worth, the recrunched hydrogen runs show a 
> > > huge increase in the "neutron" rate, factor of 2.5 where as neutron 
> > > yield increased by about 1.5 probably mostly due to misidentified 
> > > "protons".  I now even see a nice missing mass peak in the hydrogen 
> > > runs.  Is it possible that we are no assigning more hits to the 
> > > neutron detector than before or not assigning enough to the tofs. Or 
> > > maybe bats somehow get in the way.  Please... I need your help.
> > >                                                                Cheers, 
> > > Vitaliy
> > >
> > > Chris Crawford wrote:
> > >
> > >> hi eugene,
> > >>  you can always do a joint analysis from dst and raw data.  just open 
> > >> both filetypes together, and loop through them in sync.
> > >> --chris
> > >>
> > >> Eugene J. Geis wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> lrd is not generating new lr-#### ntuples as well as flr and dst?  I 
> > >>> notice none
> > >>> in the recrunch directory.  Is there potentially a new entry with 
> > >>> all wire
> > >>> chamber hits per event regardless of a link to a track?  Could be quite
> > >>> important for the neutrons...  -eg
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Quoting Michael Kohl <kohlm@mit.edu>:
> > >>>
> > >>>  
> > >>>
> > >>>> Vitaliy,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Chi mentioned to me that in this BlastLib version the dst header 
> > >>>> information is not copied over. Maybe this is related to your
> > >>>> problem?!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Look at the yields for each spin state separately if your asymmetries
> > >>>> are inconclusive.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  Michael
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -- 
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
> > >>>> | Office:                             | Home:                    |
> > >>>> |-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
> > >>>> | Dr. Michael Kohl                    | Michael Kohl             |
> > >>>> | Laboratory for Nuclear Science      | 5 Ibbetson Street        |
> > >>>> | MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143     |
> > >>>> | Middleton, MA 01949                 | U.S.A.                   |
> > >>>> | U.S.A.                              |                          |
> > >>>> | -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  | -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
> > >>>> | Email: kohlm@mit.edu                | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de    |
> > >>>> | Work: +1-617-253-9207               | Home:   +1-617-629-3147  |
> > >>>> | Fax:  +1-617-253-9599               | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190  |
> > >>>> | http://blast.lns.mit.edu            |                          |
> > >>>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>   
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >>>
> > >>> Eugene Geis
> > >>> PhD Student, Physics Department, ASU
> > >>> Research Affiliate, MIT-Bates Laboratory of Nuclear Science
> > >>> eugene.geis@asu.edu
> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >>>
> > >>> -------------------------------water is 
> > >>> good------------------------------
> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >>>
> > >>>      **  Check Out the Phatty Acidz @ http://www.phattyacidz.com  **
> > >>>  
> > >>>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST