[BLAST_ANAWARE] Minutes of the 2005/06/22 analysis meeting

From: Michael Kohl (kohlm@mit.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 22 2005 - 22:09:42 EDT


Hi,

this email is also available in
http://blast.lns.mit.edu/PRIVATE_RESULTS/USEFUL/
ANALYSIS_MEETINGS/meeting_050622/

People should copy their shown slides into the above directory.

Minutes:

-Review of "kinematical corrections" applied so far
-Momentum corrections from p(e,e'p) elastic (EG)
-Momentum corrections from p(e,e'p) elastic (CC)
-Momentum corrections from d(e,e'p) quasielastic (AM)
-CC's approach to obtain corrected field map

-AM: shows the actual corrections for pe and pp vs. Q2; a polynomial
 fit is used to parametrize the electron and proton momentum correction
 as a function of Q2.
 Correction was obtained from comparing distributions of reconstructed
 momenta with simulated distributions. MC was without e-loss, i.e. the
 correction function for the reconstruction effectively accounts for
 e-loss along with other effects that were not explicitly handled such
 as radiative corrections or (to-be-)improved calibrations.
 Instead of plotting pe-pe_calc(the,pp,thp),the-the_calc(pe,pp,thp)etc.
 for complete quasielastic kinematics (was too complicated to resolve
 for each individual variable analytically), it is shown pe-pe(the)
 assuming elastic kinematics, for left and right sector. Width of that
 peak is now due to both resolution and Fermi motion. Momentum
 corrections are as much as 30MeV. Missing momentum distribution
 strongly affected (30MeV/c). Stated (and shown in an earlier email to
 blast_anaware) that both EG's and AM's correction functions are
 consistent.
 +An overlaying plot of pe-pe_calc using either one of the corrections
  is yet missing

-EG: on the speakerphone. Shows slides: For ep elastic scattering, pe,
 pp, the, thp minus calculated coordinates from either chosen
 one. Correlations between pairs of measured and calculated
 variables. Aparantly, the angles are determined most precisely, and
 a correction may need to be necessary only on momenta.

-E-loss discussion: most eloss expected for tracking before wch (AM
 once did an examination of eloss in the various materials, see
 blast_anaware between 2003 and 2005;-)

-angle recontruction yields ~0.5 deg resolution

-CC: has generated another set of corrections, analogous to EG, also
 based on ep elastic scattering. The four-momentum transfer squared is
 calculated from any of the four coordinates. Also angles are affected
 somewhat.

-all three sets of corrections should be made centrally available in
 an interchangeable way (such as a header file to be loaded by user
 macros)
-consistency of the three methods needs to demonstrated on the same
 dataset, both for hydrogen and deuterium, in overlay plots showing
 relevant quantities before/after each of the corrections.

-CC presenting method to study effects of fieldmap on
 reconstruction. If the fieldmap is reponsible, the differences of
 measured minus calculated quantities for elastic scattering can be
 minimized through a variation of the discretized field on a
 grid. Determine deviations of Bfield as variational problem to match
 up momenta. Numerical determination of partial derivatives.

-Systematics of reconstruction:
 geometry -> survey; straight tracks
 mag field!!-> survey; CC's new method to calulate corrections
 eloss -> Geant
 bugs -> can be tested with MC and reconstruction of MC events
 t2d -> can be tested by hits in situ
 radcor -> calculable

-Strategy for the future:
 +use kinematic corrections as last resort to account for residual
  unknowns.
 +improve above systematics to best knowledge, this should minimize
  the magnitude of kinematic corrections
 +results of the geometry survey and field measurements are awaited
 +as sytematics get more and more understood, "kinematic corrections need
  to be re-evaluated.

Focus of the next meeting will be a review of radiative effects. The
next meeting will be on Thursday, 6/30 (not Wednesday) at 10am in the
library.

Regards,

   Michael

-- 

+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+ | Office: | Home: | |-------------------------------------|--------------------------| | Dr. Michael Kohl | Michael Kohl | | Laboratory for Nuclear Science | 5 Ibbetson Street | | MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143 | | Middleton, MA 01949 | U.S.A. | | U.S.A. | | | - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - -| | Email: kohlm@mit.edu | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de | | Work: +1-617-253-9207 | Home: +1-617-629-3147 | | Fax: +1-617-253-9599 | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190 | | http://blast.lns.mit.edu | | +-------------------------------------+--------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:32 EST