sorry I did not understand you correctly
yes, I found the same problem and I would definitely exclude them.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Nikolas Meitanis wrote:
> I guess I didnt say it exactly: when I run flr.C (through my macros) or
> when I run count_charge.C from the /Charge directory,
> I get zero in return...Does that mean that the chage info in the flr
> ntuple is missing?
>
> n
>
> Chi Zhang wrote:
>
> >the charge file (,chg file) is not a required part for analysis. charge is
> >written in a chg ntuple in lr/flr root file. when you use flr.C to load
> >the ntuple, charge is retrieved from this chg ntuple.
> >
> >On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Nikolas Meitanis wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>In the interest of compiling a list of good runs for the 2005 data:
> >> I couldnt find charge files for the following runs:
> >>
> >>14676, 15809, 16054, 16134, 16181.
> >>
> >>Should I attempt to recrunch the runs or can the charge files be
> >>obtained independently?
> >>
> >>thanks,
> >>n
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:32 EST