Yes I know about point 2, let me get back to you on this-
Pete
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, John Calarco wrote:
>
> Pete,
>
> 1.) on the plot, the T10 axis should be labeled T^e_10.
>
> 2.) regarding the sogn convention, the sign for T10 affects the value
> of T11. How big is the effect?
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Peter Karpius wrote:
>
> > Hi folks-
> >
> > After suggestions yesterday to extract T10 I have done this and it
> > is shown in the attached plot. This question of the sign of T10 rears its
> > ugly head again however and now I am thinking that it is positive as this
> > is what the data are telling me. The
> > problem is that it all comes down to a convention and symmetry properties
> > relating analyziing powers and polarization tensors. The 2nd Q2
> > point is consistent with zero but the first is not. Anyway, please take
> > a look at the attached plots and let me know what you think. Note that I
> > am now using P_z = 0.46 as opposed to 0.5. In the mean time I will
> > address the other fixes to my talk.
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > Pete Karpius
> > Graduate Research Assistant
> > Nuclear Physics Group
> > University of New Hampshire
> > phone: (603)978-6152
> > FAX: (603)862-2998
> > email: karpiusp@einstein.unh.edu
> > http://pubpages.unh.edu/~pkarpius/homepage.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------
> >
>
> --
> John R. Calarco
> Dept. of Physics
> Univ. of New Hampshire
> Durham, NH 03824
> phone: (603)862-2088
> FAX: (603)862-2998
> email: calarco@unh.edu
>
----------------------------------------------
Pete Karpius
Graduate Research Assistant
Nuclear Physics Group
University of New Hampshire
phone: (603)978-6152
FAX: (603)862-2998
email: karpiusp@einstein.unh.edu
http://pubpages.unh.edu/~pkarpius/homepage.htm
----------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST