Hi, Wang, Chris and all CVS-knowledgeable people!
Is there a branch I could check out right now if I want to include
(CVS check in) everything I want for my e-p analysis?
About a week ago, Chi kindly included my ep_skim structure in lrn and lrd.
Wang, did you check out the head version? That includes Chi's changes.
Then, did you already make another branch to include all the BAT info you
have been working on?
If the two above steps are done, how can I check out your branch (exact
CVS command)? I need that so that I change some event selection criteria.
Please let me know.
Adrian
-------------------------------
Adrian Sindile
Research Assistant
Nuclear Physics Group
University of New Hampshire
phone: (603)862-1691
FAX: (603)862-2998
email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Wang Xu wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> Since almost every one submit some codes into the head version
> without fully debuging the codes, (In fact, it is very difficult to debug)
> It often cause some mistakes, even segmentation faults. Because we will do
> a big recrunch for all recent runs, therefore I suggest we should make a
> branch and carefully check the codes, then start to do recrunch.
> Wang
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Wang Xu wrote:
>
> > Hi Adrian,
> > I did not setup time information. Other than that, everything are
> > inculded in Bats software.
> > Codes currently are in cvs_v3bats/ directary.
> > Wang
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Wang!
> > > Here is the TOF info I am currently using in my analysis:
> > >
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_PAD(),
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->PathLength(),
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_rtime(),
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_time(),
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_E(),
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_Chi2(),
> > > gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_Y(),
> > >
> > > Do we have these for the BATs (except, of course, the Chi2 of the track,
> > > since the BATs are outside the WC acceptance)? What else will we have
> > > there?
> > >
> > > Also, since we will be recrunching from the head version of BlastLib2, why
> > > don't you merge your stuff into the head version (unless somebody sees a
> > > problem with this - please speak up guys, if so)?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Adrian
> > >
> > > -------------------------------
> > > Adrian Sindile
> > > Research Assistant
> > > Nuclear Physics Group
> > > University of New Hampshire
> > > phone: (603)862-1691
> > > FAX: (603)862-2998
> > > email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
> > > http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST