Hi chi:
also, the time dependence is important: if you have indication that
Tensorpol was higher/lower at some point please send me the run numbers
since we need to compare that with ee'p !!
Below are the run numbers I typically use for ee'p (admittedly, not all
run numbers) At the meeting we will compare ed tensor (you) and ee'p (me)
It would make things so much simpler if we use the same data set.
5904-5910 5912-5919 5921-5928 5930-5937 5939-5946 5948-5952 5954 5955
5958-5963 5966-5973 5975-5983 5985-5992 5995-6001 6003-6007 6009-6013
6023 6025-6029 6032-6038 6040-6042 6048 6049-6052 6126-6127 6129-6136
6138-6145 6147 6149 6154-6157 6162-6167 6170-6176 6178-6188 6190-6197
6200-6206 6208-6215 6218-6224 6226-6233 6238-6239
-- ________________________________________________________________________________ Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124 research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Chi Zhang wrote:
> > > Analysis – Tancredi > > - Discrepancy between Genya and Chi’s tensor polarizations > > resolved (sign error in Genya’s code) > not sure about this yet. Both of us found mistakes in our calculation, > however, after correcting them, there is still a 10% gap left to be > resolved. We are checking the form factor calculation against each other. > > Chi > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST