Hi, sorry I only see these messages today.
for Epics.map, one should always use the latest even if it is
different from the map when run is taken/crunched. The reason being that
we always only append to the map so there is no shuffling of channel names
and channel indices. lrn relys on a complete map for access to all epics
channels. if a map missing some channel names(like epics~02) is used, the
missing channels would get a random channel index and cause seg-faults
when lrn try to access: raw->epics[index].value.
As long as we stick to the rule of only append to epics.map, we should
alway just use the latest epics.map.
I do not know if the electronics.map is any different now from the one
used in that "dark period". Even there are differences, I bet the
differences are only in LADS and maybe Neutron counters. Should anyway
make no difference to Adrian I hope.
Chi
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> Hi, Tancredi!
> Thanks for the reply about Epics.map.
> Do you happen to know about the electronics map we used between 02/12/2004
> and 02/18/2004 too? I appreciate your taking the time for this (it's only
> a problem because of that elog thing, I would not bother you with this
> otherwise). Thanks again!
>
> Adrian
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Tancredi Botto wrote:
>
> >
> > indeed we started with epics~01 had the elog problem (would have been
> > nice if anyobdy called..) and then we are running epics~03 since then
> > (feb 18). Those two maps are identically. I don't think ~02 was ever used,
> > anyways if anything it is only missing these buffer vesel fields.
> >
> > < ABS:UGFSVUpstreamstatusbi.RVAL 1168 1
> > < ABS:IntV14statusbi.RVAL 1169 1
> > < up:buf:5B:sta 1170 1
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ________________________________________________________________________________
> > Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124
> > research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Tancredi!
> > > I went to the elog archive and I can see a bunch of map files (both epics
> > > and electronics - see below) but in the DOWNLOAD_LOG there is no info from
> > > the time period covered by those runs I asked about (02/12/2004 to
> > > 02/18/2004).
> > > So one can see files there, but I do not know which one was downloaded
> > > when. If that's the only place this info is recorded, I am afraid we don't
> > > have that info anymore - or do we? If we do, can you please tell me how to
> > > get it, in more detail? Thanks!
> > >
> > > <spud3:26> pwd
> > > /home/daq/blast/pro2004/elog/archive/Electronics
> > > <spud3:27> ls -lrt
> > > total 640
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 63965 Jan 21 16:13 Electronics~01.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 63996 Feb 17 14:19 Electronics~02.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 64003 Feb 18 12:11 Electronics~03.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 64003 Feb 18 14:26 Electronics~04.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 65975 Feb 19 08:09 Electronics~05.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 66045 Feb 19 18:15 Electronics~06.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 67717 Feb 20 18:10 Electronics~07.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 67718 Feb 21 16:57 Electronics~08.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 67905 Feb 23 19:54 Electronics~09.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 98 Feb 26 12:36 DOWNLOAD_LOG
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 19 Feb 26 12:36 CURRENT_MAP
> > >
> > > <spud3:28> less DOWNLOAD_LOG
> > > Sat Feb 21 17:28:35 EST 2004 Electronics~08.map
> > >
> > > Thu Feb 26 12:36:52 EST 2004 Electronics~09.map
> > > DOWNLOAD_LOG (END)
> > >
> > > <spud3:29> pwd
> > > /home/daq/blast/pro2004/elog/archive/Epics
> > > <spud3:32> ls -lrt
> > > total 124
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 36864 Jan 14 21:40 Epics~02.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 36994 Feb 9 19:57 Epics~01.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 37013 Feb 18 12:10 Epics~03.map
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 129 Feb 18 12:16 DOWNLOAD_LOG
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 blast blast 13 Feb 18 12:16 CURRENT_MAP
> > >
> > > <spud3:38> less DOWNLOAD_LOG
> > > Wed Feb 18 12:04:50 EST 2004 Epics~02.map
> > > Wed Feb 18 12:12:14 EST 2004 Epics~03.map
> > > Wed Feb 18 12:16:54 EST 2004 Epics~03.map
> > > DOWNLOAD_LOG (END)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Tancredi Botto wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > pro/elog/epics/archive (or something like that)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
> > > > Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124
> > > > research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949
> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Chi, Tancredi, guys!
> > > > > What were the electronics map and Epics map for runs between 4686 and
> > > > > 4857 and how can somebody find this information? There is nothing in the
> > > > > database (or on the elog webpage) - is this because elog was not popping
> > > > > up those windows at the end of runs a few weeks ago?
> > > > > Can we retrieve this info from someplace?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, what are the most up-to-date Wire.calib files for both inbending and
> > > > > outbending fields?
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Adrian
> > > > >
> > > > > -------------------------------
> > > > > Adrian Sindile
> > > > > Research Assistant
> > > > > Nuclear Physics Group
> > > > > University of New Hampshire
> > > > > phone: (603)862-1691
> > > > > FAX: (603)862-2998
> > > > > email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
> > > > > http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST