My appologies to Bill and every one else. It was inappropiate,cynical
though hardly "profanity-laced" to say what I said and it will never
happen again. I will always be positive in my log book entrie from now
on.. Once again, SORRY.
Vitaliy
Bill Franklin wrote:
>Vitaliy,
>
>Look, all of us want the experiment to run well. While frustration with
>problems that we've had is understandable, especially if you're
>consistently spending nights here trying to get thesis data, posting
>cynical profanity-laced messages to the log book and e-mail list is
>counterproductive. I think everyone realizes the importance of getting as
>much quality data as possible while the beam is available and the present
>transmitter problem underscores that. The fact is that aside from last
>night, the accelerator has been running well since we came back from the
>shutdown. The data that have been taken on deuterium look encouraging.
>Devoting a few hours of beam time to needed calibrations and consistency
>checks before running for days and weeks on end can go a long way. Keep
>your head up.
>
>Bill
>
>On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Electronic Log Book wrote:
>
>
>
>>Operators: ajmasch vziskin vziskin
>>
>>Some shit broke again. Called in the experts. Will take all night to
>>fix. Typical. Can't remember last time we ran for 24 hours straight.
>>The guys in the CCR tell me they used to run for days on end before
>>BLAST. Somehow, it seems to make all the sense in the world. They will
>>fix this problem just in time to open up the hall for more work. And
>>them something else will trip, rip, crap out or burn. One more
>>question, how come we shield a left cerenkov wall and the right cerenkov
>>wall becomes more efficient. Or is this one of those BLAST misteries.
>>I think that's it. F**k it , I'm going home.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST