One more thing: when I looked at the helicity and target state information
we stamp on physics events, I only saw helicity -1, consistent with what
I am getting from the scaler events (see previous email) and with what the
charge.C macro gives us if we run it now.
So my question stays: how did we get the charge-3697.chg file? Is it
wrong (Tancredi, Chi - can you look into this please)? If the file is
correct, I would appreciate some insight.
Thanks again!
Adrian
-------------------------------
Adrian Sindile
Research Assistant
Nuclear Physics Group
University of New Hampshire
phone: (603)862-1691
FAX: (603)862-2998
email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST