I'm using lrn. And I need to use the latest monte-carlo since it has
newest geomentry.
Vitaliy
Tancredi Botto wrote:
>vitaly,
>why don't you use lrn ? It should work for both data and montecarlo and it
>should be the only one to use.
>
>And what montecarlo events are you trying to generate anyways? It seems an
>e'pn final state and the problems you report have to do with neutrons
>pointing out of plane, at the edge of our acceptance.
>
>On thing to check if whether geant generates secondaries off your
>60 MeV/c neutron. That could be another explanation of why you get such
>a strange event. I'd not try to reconstruct that..
>
>then, the recon code may have a preference for n rather than p, but of
>course it is because it accepts two tracks only. But what happens if you
>use lrn ? What is the reconstructed charge/bending of your "neutron" ??
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST