> maybe i'm missing something, but i thought this was already accounted
> for by using the beam-gated integegrated current (where the gate is
> inhibited during daq deadtime)?
> --chris
that is fine. now what's the charge/luminosity assumed in the montecarlo
file ? see readme.
> > --
> >________________________________________________________________________________
> >Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124
> >research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949
> >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Aaron Joseph Maschinot wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>is it "correct" to normalize the Monte Carlo count rates by the real-data
> >>charges? if not, is their some way to calculate the MC charge (i.e.
> >>whatever dgen uses)? the scalers aren't in the MC, so i can't just run
> >>charge.C on a MC file, i don't think.
> >>
> >>aaron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST