Thank you, Chris!
I will try v2_15. Meanwhile, I want to say something that has been on my
mind for a while, please READ ON... others have been saying it too, maybe
not too loud (see Chi's email about lrn freezing two days ago:
> I also spot a strange thing about lrn.C, "scal_inhcharge" is first
> used at line 299, but declared at line 469 AND in a else if block. In
> principle, it shoudl not run and should complaine about undeclared
> variables.)
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Chris Crawford wrote:
> hi, adrian
> sounds like something tancredi added, w/o checking the mc. i'll fix
> it before tagging the new version v2_20 today. for the meantime, you
> can try v2_18, or v2_15 (if 18 doesn't work.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been signaling that lots of macros that are tampered with become
full of bugs etc. (not to mention that some were written so they give
you 20 errors from the start, probably with the hope that others will fix
them). The official advice I got one time was that "I have permission to
fix them" - I consider this arrogant at least.
I think it is time we get serious about shooting ourselves in the foot, so
people who obviously do not understand programming should keep away from
the common codes in the blast area. It is not a shame not to be a software
guru, and nobody knows everything, so why try hard to mess up common code?
It would be a great help for everybody...
Adrian
>
> >Hi!
> >Can anyone tell me what versions (branches, tags etc.) should I use in MC
> >and BlastLib2 in order to have compatible codes?
> >
> >I do not know if this is related to the update error in v2 made a while
> >ago (mentioned by Tancredi on May 28th), but I cannot make any version of
> >reconstruction (using lrn.C) to work with either MC v3 or MC v2 - I get
> >complains about both .coda files. A sample following:
> >
> >root -l lrn.C -m +nw -n 1000 -pid
> >root [0]
> >Processing lrn.C...
> >Electronics map is for Monte Carlo data.
> >Calibration file:
> >/home/blast/adrian/physics/RECON/Blast_Params/blast.sc_mc
> >Counting multiples of 100 events.
> >_________________________
> >
> >Opening data file: event.coda
> >Unknown event type!
> >rawData: (0x41cd4008)
> > 0000001C 00000000 12345678 00000000
> > 00000018 00000001 00000009 00000011
> > 00000019 00000021 00000029 00000031
> > 00000039 00000041 00000049 00000051
> > 00000059 00000061 00000069 00000071
> > here 1000
> >
> > 1 Error: Can't call TBLRaw::GetSHtgtstate1() in current scope
> >FILE:lrn.C LINE:285
> >Possible candidates are...
> >filename line:size busy function type and name (in TBLRaw)
> >Error: Symbol raw is not defined in current scope FILE:lrn.C LINE:285
> >Error: Failed to evaluate raw.GetSHtgtstate1()Possible candidates are...
> >filename line:size busy function type and name
> >*** Interpreter error recovered ***
> >
> >
> >For other cases, the errors were different (depending on what version I
> >was using, I tried both cvs up rv2 and rb2_18 for BlastLib2).
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Adrian
> >
> >-------------------------------
> >Adrian Sindile
> >Research Assistant
> >Nuclear Physics Group
> >University of New Hampshire
> >phone: (603)862-1691
> >FAX: (603)862-2998
> >email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
> >http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST