adrian,
Yes the issue wqas resolved also then. At backward angles you a see a
proton and an electron peak. an we fit what we think is the e- peak
-- see you tonight
________________________________________________________________________________
Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124
research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> Hi, Tancredi!
> I have a question (I will be on shift this evening, anyway, but just for
> my education)...
> I remember at the end of July there was a discussion that since we were
> not getting many electrons at backward angles, we would have really liked
> to have better working Cerenkovs - otherwise we would retime with protons
> in that region; since protons are slower (and really not reliable for
> timing), that would create problems.
> Did we get around this problem this time? I was not on any retiming shift,
> just want to make sure I understand...
> Thanks!
>
> Adrian
>
> -------------------------------
> Adrian Sindile
> Research Assistant
> Nuclear Physics Group
> University of New Hampshire
> phone: (603)862-1691
> FAX: (603)862-2998
> email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
> http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:28 EST