Re: Plan and update

From: Tancredi Botto (tancredi@mitlns.mit.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 02:10:25 EDT


Hi adrian, we are both online.
It was indeed found (see logbook, please) that the different scint
length and light guides for the start counter are such that the signal
is generated ca. 15 ns earlier then the TOF's
good luck with the beam !
-- t
________________________________________________________________________________
Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124
research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Adrian T Sindile wrote:

> > that delay unit (a 19" inch panel) served the purpose to delay the
> > start counter by the required 15 ns (shorter paddle, not cable). It
> > is possible to just use a dual nim delay module at the bottom of rack
> > left (tavi nows)
>
> We got back to that delay, we were concerned we could screw up timing. Now
> we just take the output of the delay unit, we should be all set.
>
> Adrian
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:28 EST