A comment about the high rates w/o start counter:
If we are swamped at forward angles a possibility to handle the rates is to include the forward Cerenkov boxes (R and L) into the trigger. At NIKHEF this was always done in Bigbite.
>From the Cerenkov plots I have seen it looks to me that the forward Cerenkov are working well. With respect to efficiencies, I think is too early to use that term yet.
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Tancredi Botto <tancredi@mitlns.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:56:10 -0400 (EDT)
>
>some good data, more checks, considerations about background/trigger, 
>vacuum trip and software update.
>
>
>Good elastic runs: 790 and 792 (the latter w/ modified trigger, requiring
>=================  or excluding cerenkov where appropriate). Run 790 (1 sccm) 
>                   is very long (ca 70k events).
>
>Background and rates:  When I take start coutner out of the trigger (still
>=====================  requiring a L/R coinc) the trigger rate goes up by 
>                       a factor 20/30 - ca. 20 Hz/mA which we can't handle.
>Conclusion: we are actually *swmaped* by background but have never 
>looked at it yet. This coincident stuff is clearly coming from upstream of 
>the target as the start counter integrates everything coming out of the IT 
>point. Later in the day I play with the slits. The values at which slits 
>start affecting the beam are slightly different that what compton people
>found. After injection, I am able to reduce the normalized rate by a 
>factor of 10, without many changes to the lifetime (anyways short today, 
>5.5 mins at 1 sccm). I can inject 60 mA with slits at some intermediate 
>position, reducing the normalized rate a factor of 3. Note slits movement
>is slow (can be changed) so I decide not to ask for a dynamic setting yet
>(inject, close, measure, open, re-inejct..). CLearly beam position should 
>be as stable as possible, but experience tells you may end up doing the 
>slits game over and over again. Sure it'll be more fun with a collimator 
>and field on.
>
>KEEP start counter in trigger or coda will immediately crash.
>
>Trigger studies: given the above, can not take out start counter 
>===============  to study the missing e-p coinc with protons on left. 
>                 Still missing. I play with cerenkovs (see logbooks) and 
>enofrce them in the trigger for selected paddles, can improve S/N ratio
>of elastics a factor about 3 (!!) in L11-L12. This should also come out 
>of analysis (see  later). 
>
>Vacuum problem: after overnight compton we are about to start. Set target 
>==============  flow to 1 sccm. We then realizing injection valve was 
>                closed and open it right away. Results in a vacuum 
>trip of the IT are. The transient flow (according to the epics screen) 
>went as high as 13 sccm (we know that don't trip at 10 sccm) at there
>was beam on target. LIGIT switches off and turbos protected. Bad bad bad!  
>We understand that this could have happened at the flow controller, since 
>the gas pressure is not buffered. Found no comments about this 
>possible scenario in manual. It resulted in losing about 3 hrs before a 
>tech came in, brought roughin pump downstairs (no bypass either).
>
>
>Workaround: it is very important to prevent operator dumbness.
>==========  I suggest that the control screens must inhibit setting 
>            a flow if injection valve is not open.
>
>During down time for vacuum crash we confirm that we are definitely over 
>any mis-cabling issue regarding tof's and cerenkov. Everything is in the 
>right place in the data and the analysis now. Finally!
>
>Software:  Little to add to jason's email. A number of people are taking 
>=========  over this task and soon will have public utility routine. The 
>           first goal is reproduce the 16x16 matrix plot, including 
>           now making use of pid with the C data. Have fun!
>
>
>
>Plan: as discussed with John. Tavi will progress in our studies of the
>      retiming issues (seem solved) and trigger electronics. In general, 
>      cerenkov are still very hot, and some suspiciously low efficient put
>      go to back burner tonight.
>
>Regards,
>-- tancredi
>
>________________________________________________________________________________
>Tancredi Botto,  		phone: +1-617-253-9204    fax: +1-617-253-9599
>research scientist		MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av   Middleton MA, 01949
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
-- Ricardo Alarcon617-253-9508 (ph) 617-253-9599 (fax) --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:28 EST